By DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer
Saturday, January 6, 2007
After tripling over the past 15 years, the number of foreign children adopted by Americans dropped sharply in 2006, the result of multiple factors which have jolted adoption advocates and prompted many would-be adoptive parents to reconsider their options.
The consequences could be profound for the ever-growing numbers of Americans interested in adopting abroad. Already, some have had their hopes quashed by tightened eligibility rules in China; adoptions from Africa, where millions of children have been orphaned by AIDS and wars, could increase if those from China and Eastern Europe continue to decrease.
Declines were recorded last year in nearly all countries that recently have been the top sources of adopted children â€” China, Russia, South Korea and Ukraine among them. Increases from less familiar alternatives â€” Ethiopia, Liberia, Haiti and Vietnam â€” partly offset the drop, but some experts believe the era of constantly surging foreign adoption has ended.
“The huge growth rates you saw in the ’90s â€” I think that’s over,” said Thomas DiFilipo, president of the Joint Council on International Children’s Services.
He urged Americans considering international adoption to “reassess any preconceived notions they have … and get educated on the myriad options that are available.”
Overall, according to new State Department figures, international adoptions by Americans dropped to 20,679 in the 2006 fiscal year from 22,728 in 2005 â€” the first significant decline since 1992.
Adoptions from China, the No. 1 source of children since 2000, fell 18 percent, from 7,906 to 6,493, while adoptions from Russia, the No. 2 source for the previous six years, dropped about 20 percent to a 10-year low of 3,706. Both are among many nations trying to reform their child welfare systems and increase domestic adoptions.
In some cases, reform campaigns are coupled with skepticism toward foreign adoption, including concern about occasional cases of abuse. Romania has banned adoptions by foreigners, except for relatives; Ukraine and Kazakhstan insist that foreign parents submit regular reports on their adopted children.
Thomas Atwood, president of the National Council for Adoption, said the drop in foreign adoptions is both understandable and worrisome.
“There’s always been the issue of national pride, where the country of origin wants to take care of their children themselves,” he said. “But there are so many orphans that an increase in domestic adoptions shouldn’t result in a decrease of international adoptions. We urge these countries to be enthusiastic toward both.”
Atwood sees potential for increased U.S. adoptions from Brazil, Mexico and India. He also says more African governments should be urged to overcome their traditional wariness of international adoption.
For many would-be adoptive parents in the United States, however, China is by far the country of choice. Its government-run adoption system is considered honest and efficient, and its orphanage population â€” mostly abandoned baby girls â€” is considered healthier on average than those in many other countries.
Now there is widespread concern over last year’s drop in adoptions and China’s recent announcement of new rules, to take effect May 1, regarding who can adopt. They give priority to stable married couples between 30 and 50. Single people, and those suffering from obesity or depression, will lose out.
Among those dismayed by the rules is Ann Freeman, 42, a travel agent from West Valley City, Utah, whose longtime dream of adopting a Chinese child has been dashed by the new curb on single parents.
“I’m heartbroken,” she said. “This child would have been the world to me.”
Her preparations included learning Chinese and studying child psychology. She eventually may consider adopting from elsewhere in the Far East, but worries that other countries’ programs aren’t as reliable as China’s.
The same new rule against single parents would have prevented Anna Spitz, a University of Arizona research coordinator, from adopting her two thriving Chinese daughters â€” Rachel, 14, and Sarah, 9.
Spitz credited Chinese authorities with seeking the best homes possible for orphaned children, but finds the new rule “a little insulting.”
“I recognize it’s nice to have two-parent families,” she said. “But it makes me sad that a lot of single parents who’d create great families won’t be able to adopt now.”
Chinese officials say the new rules will shorten the waiting time â€” now around 15 months â€” for well-qualified couples. China also wants more children with disabilities to be adopted overseas; criteria for people willing to adopt special-needs children is slightly more lax than for other adoptions.
The number of orphans and abandoned babies in China remains substantial, though authorities say it is dwindling. About 51,000 were adopted in 2005, according to the government â€” 13,000 by foreign families, the rest in China.
Professor Li Luxin, deputy secretary general of the China Association for Juvenile Studies, said domestic adoptions will surely increase.
“More families are well-off,” he said. “They own apartments and cars and it is a way for them to repay society by adopting an orphan.”
The president of one of America’s largest China-oriented adoption agencies, Joshua Zhong of Colorado-based Chinese Children Adoption International, said China’s new restrictions were in line with those of many other countries, and he predicted China would remain the top choice for Americans seeking to adopt.
However, he hopes democratic reforms will occur in China that shrink the pool of abandoned children.
“I’m praying to be out of a job as soon as possible,” said Zhong, a one-time child member of the Red Guard who came to the United States in 1986. “I want to see a China where no one will be abandoned.”
The only major country of origin to increase U.S. adoptions in 2006 was Guatemala; with 4,135 adoptions. It overtook Russia in the No. 2 spot.
However, that status is expected to change later this year when the United States ratifies the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoptions, a pact setting tough standards which Guatemala’s corruption-prone adoption system doesn’t meet. Adoptions may be suspended while Guatemala tries to make required changes; some experts doubt the number will ever return to last year’s level.
Some advocates worry that the Hague treaty, though well-intentioned, might not succeed in encouraging more international adoptions.
“We sincerely hope that all the good work that’s being done isn’t going to result in fewer adoptions,” said Lee Allen, a spokesman for the National Council for Adoption. “Every time adoptions slow down in these countries, it means less opportunities for kids to have a home in America. It’s not just numbers â€” it’s a tragedy.”
Associated Press writer Audra Ang in Beijing contributed to this report.
Foster care reform